Ante-nicene Trinitarianism?

To further the point that I have made against the “anonymous” commentor, Brandon Salus, in an earlier post, I would like to provide some historical resources concerning the Trinity from the period before the Council of Nicea (AD 325). My friend, whom I assume is a Jehovah’s Witness, or some other proponent of modern Arianism, thinks that the Trinity is pagan and didn’t exist in the church until after the fourth century. The following are quotations from ante-Nicene patristic writers regarding the Trinity. I grant that in this early period the formulations of Trinitarian creedal statements are not always as tight as later ones. But the evidence more than proves that the church, from its inception, was deeply Trinitarian.

The Didache (ca. 50-100)

“And concerning baptism, baptize this way: Having first said all these things, baptize into the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, in living water.” Didache, chapt. 7.

Polycarp of Smyrna (69-155)

“On this account, and concerning all things, I praise thee, I bless thee, I glorify thee, together with the eternal and heavenly Jesus Christ thy beloved Son, with whom to thee and the Holy Spirit be glory both now and for ever. Amen.” Martyrdon of Polycarp, 14.3.

Ignatius of Antioch (ca. 50-98/117)
“Look for Him who is above all time, eternal and invisible, yet who became visible for our sakes; impalpable and impassible, yet who became passible on our account; and who in every kind of way suffered for our sakes.” Ignatius, Epistle to Polycarp Shorter Version, chapt. 3.

Ireneaus of Lyons (born between 115 and 125)
“Now God shall be glorified in His handiwork, fitting it so as to be conformable to, and modelled after, His own Son. For by the hands of the Father, that is, by the Son and the Holy Spirit, man, and not [merely] a part of man, was made in the likeness of God.” Irenaeus of Lyons, Against Heresies, Book V.VI.1.

Tertullian of Carthage (b. 160)
“As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons — the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. How they are susceptible of number without division, will be shown as our treatise proceeds.” Tertullian, Against Praexis, chapt. 2. (The whole of this treatise is Trinitarian.)

Origen (185-232)
“For even although something else existed before the Holy Spirit, it was not by progressive advancement that He came to be the Holy Spirit; as if any one should venture to say, that at the time when He was not yet the Holy Spirit He was ignorant of the Father, but that after He had received knowledge He was made the Holy Spirit. For if this were the case, the Holy Spirit would never be reckoned in the Unity of the Trinity, i.e., along with the unchangeable Father and His Son, unless He had always been the Holy Spirit.” Origen, de Principiis, I.III.4.



Filed under Uncategorized

4 responses to “Ante-nicene Trinitarianism?

  1. pilgrim

    Now some fundamentalist arminian will think you’re in cahoots with the Roman Catholics because you quoted Churh Fathers.

    But I won’t.

    I’ll just say–“Amen.”

  2. Rogers Meredith

    Or you could do like St. Nicolas and slap the arian, virtually of course.

  3. Anonymous


    This website summarizes 300 United States court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah’s Witnesses, including dozens of cases where the Parents refused to consent to life-saving blood transfusions:


    This website summarizes 160 United States court cases and lawsuits filed by Jehovah’s Witnesses against Employers:


  4. Anonymous

    That’s a Jehovah’s Witness for you. Never mistake their lofty “reasoning from the Scriptures” with actual critical thought and discussion that grapples with the issue.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s